CitizenOutKast

You know how liberals are always going off on how Switzerland has a crime rate much lower than that of the “brutal” U.S. and that we should be more like them?

 I agree. But do you know why they have a lower crime rate?

 Guns.

 Tons of guns. Guns for all. Few gun restrictions. Don’t believe it, leftists? Then maybe you should try reading something besides the Huffington Post.

From the link:

Guns are deeply rooted within Swiss culture – but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept.

The country has a population of six million, but there are estimated to be at least two million publicly-owned firearms, including about 600,000 automatic rifles and 500,000 pistols.

Here’s where you leftists start going “uh…duh……”

Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year throughout most of their lives. Between the ages of 21 and 32 men serve as frontline troops. They are given an M-57 assault rifle and 24 rounds of ammunition which they are required to keep at home.

And this is where you start making up illogical and asinine reasons to not accept an easy truth. That truth? Guns in the hands of good people keep bad people from doing bad things.

I don’t know how much simpler I can put it. Maybe drawing stick figures or writing in crayon is more a leftist’s speed, but maybe any leftist reading that statement can find someone intelligent to help them understand it. Of course, intelligent people don’t usually befriend leftists, unless it’s out of pity, but they could try to get help.

And try watching and learning, Obamaites. You know, for the sake of novelty.

And now for a couple of little posters I made up with this picture of Obama displaying the most valuable thing he can do while in office: play outside. I know one will come across as racist, and well, if you leftists can’t take a joke, too bad. Also, apparently just questioning Obama on anything makes you a racist. Even if you’re black!

Watch this video.  Watch it all the way through no matter how sickened you are by this “man.”  All the way through it, remind yourself that this is the kind of person the Democrats refused to not protect in their “hate crime” bill.  This is the kind of person who they did not want to make sure had no special protections under this bill. In short, they actually want to give scum like this more rights than non-child molesting citizens.

This is the kind of person Obama and his ilk have decided should be protected. That should tell you more about them than anything else I could say.

I sincerely hope I’m wrong, but after viewing Obama’s so-called “character” all this time, I am going to make a prediction.

I predict that we will have no more presidential elections if Obama feels threatened.

People are talking about the election of 2012, hopefully.  They figure we can oust Obama at that election, but I don’t believe that.  I see Obama fixing the election to such a degree that Iran’s past elections look accurate by comparison or simply declaring an “emergency” (as he is wont to do) and stating that elections during the emergency will only serve to destabilize an already precarious position for the nation.

People are also looking to 2010 to vote in more Republicans to the Congress.  Why?  Republicans have proven to be just as bad as the Democrats, on the whole, and again, if Obama feels his power base will be threatened, I predict a fix or a dismissal. 

If you learn nothing else, get this straight: Obama will NOT give up power.  The only thing that will take Obama out of office while he still lives is if a bigger socialist is found that will make him look like an amateur.  Obama doesn’t want to be POTUS.  He wants to be America’s first king.  Of course, he’d just refer to himself as a Supreme Commander or President-for-Life or whatever ego-flattering title he could get away with, but he will in effect be a king.  He will not be accountable to anyone, he will have his rule unquestioned, and he will dominate with a totality that would make America’s founders weep with shame to see.

The great experiment is over.  Humanity has proven that self-rule is impossible to maintain for any real length of time.  Obama’s supporters have shown us that humans desire a king to rule over them.  If they don’t have to think, do anything, and can just muddle through their lives in sheepish acceptance, that’s what pleases them.  That’s what they want.  Obama supporters are the greatest example of pure, unadulterated subjects.  All they ask for is their king to keep them entertained, and only if Obama takes away their TVs will they resist him.  Bread and circuses are all they want, and unfortunately, there weren’t enough people who knew what Obama was and bothered to vote to keep him from winning.  Those who now express regret for having voted for him are prime examples of those taken in by pretty words, who didn’t bother to actually do any research before casting a vote.  Yet, Obama supporters (alive and dead, apparently) were able to get up and do something.  Even in my small dinky town, I had the displeasure of witnessing this first hand.  Directly in front of me was a black couple who appeared to be in their 40′s or early 50′s.  The woman stopped and posed in front of the voting booth and had her picture taken by the man.  In a quick explanation to the staffer, she said “oh, he’s taking my picture because this is the first time we’ve ever voted.” 

First time they ever voted.  And they voted for Obama.  It was all over them, like a stench.  People who couldn’t be bothered to vote at any other time in the past 20 or 30 years did vote for Obama.  These are the kind of people who support him.  These are the kinds of people who will destroy this country.

It’s only a shame they can’t suffer alone.  They’ve dragged us all down with them.

Finally finished my little media room in my basement. Where once there was a dingy, gray brick basement, there’s now a working room and a bunch of framed soon-to-be rooms.

I have to say, the very first thing my wife and I did really changed the basement way more than you’d think.  I had previously cleaned the entire basement and put some shelves down there, but it wasn’t until we painted the walls white that a huge change came about.  We also painted the floor with garage paint due to my having a little workshop down there as well.

You wouldn’t believe how much better a basement looks when the walls and lollycoms are a nice bright, clean white.  It looks so good I have no desire to drywall the brick, which is why the media room has one blue brick wall in it.

For anyone interested in this kind of project, I can offer some tips, but I’m by far an expert.  I have the wires for all the speakers running behind the drywall, including in the ceiling.  The only exposed wires are the two ceiling mounted ones and the one on the wall against the brick. I wasn’t about to chisel a channel for it, so just zip-tied it to the supporting wood I have there.  Where the wires are exposed, though, I put computer wire sleeves around them, to make them black and textured.  Even though the original wire is white, all you can see is black, which matches the speakers.

I still want to put a door in the space near the stairs, but that’s an extra that I will get to when I’m done other things.  For now, it doesn’t matter as it’s hardly necessary.

This article speaks for itself. I’ll put a few quotes here, but I strongly suggest reading the entire thing, because it will make my question, and my own answer, more valid.

Family advocates are outraged by a prom held at Boston City Hall that was open to children apparently as young as 12 featuring crossdressers, homosexual heavy petting, suspected drug use and a leather-clad doorman who teaches sexual bondage classes.

And…

MassResistance, an organization that describes itself as a pro-family action center, sent a 20-year-old college student named Max to the prom to take pictures and learn more about what Massachusetts children were doing there.

Brian Camenker of MassResistance said Max was astonished by the number of children who appeared to be between 12 and 14 years old.

“They look pretty darn young,” Camenker told WND. “He said there were a lot of middle school kids there. It really bothered him.”

The day’s events began with a transgender Elvis and a parade. Attendees were given condoms and pro-homosexual material such as a bookmark for kids on how to get involved with several homosexual groups and “Transgender Rights Now” stickers. Then many children attended the prom that evening at City Hall.

And…

Max continued, “On the flower pots and stairs leading up to the subway entrance, I saw dozens of kids aged 12-17 smoking cigarettes and making out with each other.”

He said three middle-aged lesbians with military haircuts shouted from megaphones at the more than 300 youth attendees in line for the event. They barked: “If we find you bringing alcohol, you’re going home!”; “Don’t have sex on the dance floor!” and “Are you ready to party?”

Two men helped the lesbians herd youth into City Hall. One of the men reportedly wore exceptionally tight pants and eyeliner while calling the children “sweetie” and everything around him “fabulous.” The other man wore leather bondage gear.

While BAGLY advertised the event for youth 22 and younger, Max said identification was not checked – even for people who were obviously older than 22.

“Why would 22-year-olds be mingling with 14 and 15-year-olds?” Camenker asked, troubled by the details of the event. “As we saw, they pay no attention to any age limit at all. It was full of all of these strange adults.”

Why?  That ties in with my own question: Why are gay groups so hot to spend time in schools, with school kids, discussing sex?

One of the men…calling the children “sweetie…”

Why indeed.

Could it be?  Could it just possibly be because the participants in these gay groups have motives that go way beyond just wanting kids to be tolerant?

Could it be because these gays like little kids just a bit too much?

Yes.

Gays, of course, scream “homophobe,” “hate,” “bigot,” and everything else they can think if someone dares mention that gays could also be pedophiles, but that’s because they don’t want to see what is so clearly obvious.

Adults don’t sexualize kids unless they want to be part of that child’s sexual experiences. For a gay man to go around calling little boys “sweetie,” you know he’s thinking something sexual.

If a clearly heterosexual white man went around talking about sex to little kids and calling them “sweetie,” you’d be very suspicious, and yet we’ve been trained to turn a blind eye to it when gay groups do it.  Gays have been spending quite a bit of time around little kids, knowing that they can scream to the cops or the ACLU if anyone even looks at them funny.

Max said he also saw a prominent transsexual activist who specializes in recruiting middle and high school children enter the building.

Recruiting. Trying to get middle school kids to “tolerate” and “enjoy” gay men, or at the very least, gay middle school kids. Know why?  So maybe those boys will be easier to convince that an experienced gay man can take them to the next level. 

Throughout history, gay men have enjoyed teen boys, so why should it be any different now?  What makes it worse is that our society has given these people a “get out of jail free card” in the form of hate speech, so that no one can say a word about it without worrying about being sued or sent to jail. 

The whole line of “teaching tolerance” to kids is wearing thin. The jig is up, as they say. The real motive behind “teaching tolerance” is simply “getting into the kids’ pants.”  Convince the kids that they can “experiment” and “try stuff out” without having to be ashamed and you increase the chances that they’ll be willing to be the boy-toys of gay men who will basically rape them and still not believe they are pedophiles. 

You want to teach “tolerance?” It’s easy: teach the kids to judge people by their actions, not preconceived ideas. Fine. What you don’t need to do is have a bunch of gay men have a “sex prom” with them where you can use drugs and/or alcohol to lower their inhibitions and then “convince” them to try gay sex.

For those who still want to scream “homophobe,” tell me what you would think of a “sex prom” hosted by heterosexual men where little girls were invited in, where drugs were easily seen being used, and where condoms were being distributed.  How fast would you wonder if those men were trying to have sex with the little girls?  Be honest: very fast. But when it comes to gays, we’re supposed to believe they really have the kids’ benefit at heart.

Yeah, right.

No wonder the Democrats are so determined to make sure there are no sanctions against pedophiles in their ”hate crimes bill.” If there were, how many gay groups would find themselves no longer protected?

———–

An article on why Obama scares people. A good list of the ways Obama is screwing us over. Simple enough for even a leftist to read, if not understand.

I’ll let these quotes speak mostly for themselves.  They show Obama’s nature for what it is, though, and what it is isn’t good.

Discussing the GM bankrupcy, Vox Day has this to say:

Bloomberg also noted that the combined total of the loans and payouts given by the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Department of Housing and Urban Development was $12.8 trillion as of March 31. This is equal to 90 percent of the U.S. economy, and would have been more than enough to pay off every single mortgage in the United States – not just every problem mortgage headed for default and foreclosure, but every home loan in the country! The fact that this money has not been given to mortgage borrowers but rather to mortgage holders demonstrates that neither the White House nor the Federal Reserve are genuinely concerned about homeowners losing their homes, except for the way in which their loan defaults are destroying the value of the mortgage-backed securities sold by the banks that are the presumed beneficiaries of the government and central bank largesse.

Go figure. Now, if Obama actually gave that money to people with the instructions to use it to pay off their mortgages, the money would have gone to the banks anyway. Obama could also have given the money away to the banks with the stipulation that they declare all mortgages paid in full.  Why didn’t he do that?  Because Obama doesn’t give a damn about anyone but Obama.  Given his secrecy with his birth records, he’s most likely not even a real American, so why should he care about anyone here?  Obama is in this for himself, and since this was a chance to prove he wasn’t, and he didn’t bother taking it, he’s showing America that he doesn’t care about people.  He doesn’t care that people are losing their homes, he doesn’t care that they’re losing their jobs, he doesn’t care that they are losing everything.  All he cares about is becoming the first emperor or dictator or POTUS-for-Life of the U.S., and punishing all those who get in his way.

Oh wait, my bad. There are a few people Obama DOES care about.  He cares about the ones who helped butcher Americans on 9/11.

The Obama administration has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to protect Saudi Arabia and four of its princes from being held accountable for their alleged role in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States that killed almost 3,000 Americans, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

Through its solicitor general, Elena Kagan, the Obama administration has asked that the Saudis be held immune under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, or FSIA, even though there is ample U.S. evidence of complicity by the Saudi government and the named princes in support of al-Qaida’s attack.

You leftists really think Obama was about to fall when he groveled before the Saudi king? No, he was acknowleding his respect for his master, and like a dog is now barking and biting to protect the one holding his leash.

By putting Saudi Arabia behind a shield of protection, Obama is spitting in the face of every family that lost someone in 9/11.  Think he cares?  Nope. His fellow Muslims must be defended from the infidel courts.

Families of the 9/11 victims, however, have expressed outrage over the Obama administration’s filing. They regard the action as undermining the continuing fight against terror.

I’ll bet they do.  Sadly, I can’t feel sorry for any of them that may have voted for Obama, because people were warned about him way before the election.  If they didn’t vote for him nor wanted him to win, I sympathize.

In other news, my prediction came true, and really quickly at that.  Many people knew that groups would jump all over the Tiller assassination as a way to “justify” their raging hatred towards pro-life groups, and here’s just one example:

Now, the National Organization for Women, citing “a string of murders in the service of the anti-abortion cause” and referring to the Tiller murder, released the following statement:

“Bringing the killers to justice is not enough – the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security must root out and prosecute as domestic terrorists and violent racketeers the criminal enterprise that has organized and funded criminal acts for decades,” said the statement, attributed to NOW President Kim Gandy. “We call on the new attorney general, Eric Holder, and head of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano to treat these murders in the same way they would treat politically-motivated domestic terrorism of any other kind and put the full resources of their two departments behind that effort.”

See?  As soon as the Obama Kingdom’s report on “domestic terrorists” came out, they were just waiting for something to justify it.  One person kills one abortionist, and all of a sudden, NOW is basically demanding that all pro-lifers be arrested and locked up for the protection of society.  You know that pro-life grandmother of 80 who uses a walker and sleeps for 10 hours a day, and gets outside once a week?  Well, according to NOW, she’s just waiting for her chance to load her AK-47 and go gunnin’ down some baby killers.  I’m sure that walker has retractable knives in the legs and can fold up to serve as a club when granny gets into the local abortion clinic and goes all Rambo on their asses.

Now look at the wording of that demand.  Notice something?  How many abortionists were just recently killed in the Tiller case? 

One.

How many “pro-lifers” participated in the killing?

One.

But what does the demand say?

“Killers.”

“Murders.”

She uses the plural form of the words.  Why?  To make it sound like there is more violence against abortionists than there really is.  This is a smear tactic.  Instead of letting the American public see the truth, that one man killed another, they want to make it sound like there is a rash of brutal slayings all over the place and that justifies having the government treat people like terrorists.

You see, these types of “pro-choice” people (and I use that term loosely) have a burning hatred towards those who disagree with them.  They don’t like it when people argue or debate them.  Heck, they don’t even want people to disagree with them.  But all this time, they haven’t been able to vent that hate without looking like raving lunatics because pro-life people are pro-LIFE. They don’t go around killing people.  The amount of killings in decades can be counted on one hand from what I’ve seen, and screaming about that would make these pro-choicers look like fools.  After all, anyone with a brain knows you can’t take the actions of one or two or three or four people to intelligently represent a group, especially when those people are acting against the agreed upon principles of that group.

But, they know that if they act wisely, they may just be able to turn the tide.  By using the plural form of killer and murder, they are trying to turn American sentiment against pro-lifers. They have an outlet for their rage and hate and believe that they will look compassionate and concerned, rather than like dogs foaming at the mouth.  Obama, of course, will play right up to that, because his administration wants more “proof” that those who oppose him are dangers to society as a whole. Now more than ever, Americans need to think for themselves, watch their “leaders” more carefully than ever, and hold them accountable for everything they do.  Otherwise, we are totally screwed.

And on that point, now that Obama wants to create his “people’s car,” he has taken one more play out of Hitler’s book. It won’t be long now before America’s fall.  All because the nation’s population of morons were finally given a message they could easily chant while turning off their minds.  “Change.”  One word that spells disaster, because idiots wouldn’t ask themselves “is all change good?”